Peer Review Policy

The primary objective of this peer review policy is to ensure the highest standards of academic rigor, originality, and relevance in the published articles of the International Journal of the Universe and Humanity in Islamic Vision and Perspective. The policy aims to maintain the journal's reputation as a reliable source of scholarly knowledge and to contribute to the advancement of research in the field of Islamic studies, particularly as it relates to the universe and humanity.

Scope

This policy applies to all original research articles submitted to the journal. It does not apply to other types of submissions, such as book reviews, commentaries, or special issues.

Double-Blind Peer Review Process

The journal employs a double-blind peer review process. This means that both the authors and reviewers remain anonymous to each other throughout the review process. This anonymity is intended to promote objectivity and impartiality in the evaluation of submissions.

Reviewer Selection

Reviewers are selected based on their expertise in the field of Islamic studies, with a particular focus on the areas of the universe and humanity. Reviewers are chosen for their academic qualifications, research experience, and commitment to maintaining high standards of scholarly inquiry.

Review Criteria

Reviewers are asked to evaluate submissions based on the following criteria:

• Originality: Does the article present new ideas, findings, or perspectives?
• Significance: Is the research question important and relevant to the field of Islamic studies?
• Methodology: Is the methodology sound and appropriate for the research question?
• Clarity: Is the article well-written and easy to understand?
• Evidence: Is the evidence presented in support of the author's claims credible and sufficient?
• Contribution: Does the article contribute to the existing body of knowledge in the field?

Review Process

1. Submission: Authors submit their manuscripts to the journal's editorial office.
2. Initial Screening: The editor-in-chief conducts an initial screening of the manuscript to determine its suitability for the journal.
3. Assignment to Reviewers: Manuscripts that pass the initial screening are assigned to two or three reviewers.
4. Review Period: Reviewers are given a specified amount of time to complete their reviews.
5. Review Decision: Based on the reviewers' recommendations, the editor-in-chief makes a decision regarding the manuscript. This decision may be one of the following:
   • Accept: The manuscript is accepted for publication without revisions.
   • Accept with Revisions: The manuscript is accepted for publication, subject to revisions.
   • Revise and Resubmit: The manuscript is returned to the author for revision and resubmission.
   • Reject: The manuscript is rejected for publication.

Appeals Process

Authors who disagree with a rejection decision may submit an appeal to the editor-in-chief. The appeal will be reviewed by a panel of independent experts.

Confidentiality

All information related to the peer review process, including the identities of reviewers and the content of reviews, will be kept confidential.

Ethical Considerations

Reviewers are expected to adhere to the highest ethical standards in their evaluations. This includes avoiding plagiarism, conflict of interest, and bias. Reviewers are also expected to treat the manuscripts they review with confidentiality.

This peer review policy is intended to ensure the quality and integrity of the International Journal of the Universe and Humanity in Islamic Vision and Perspective. By adhering to this policy, the journal can maintain its reputation as a leading scholarly publication in the field of Islamic studies.